Q. After finishing studying in the United States I treated myself to a West Coast road trip, hiring a car from Hertz at Los Angeles airport. I paid $117 (£76) for rental car protection and $168.35 (£109) as a Liability Insurance Supplement. At Huntington Beach I was hit from behind while stationary at a red light. I immediately notified the police, obtained a witness statement confirming I was not at fault and notified Hertz within an hour of the incident. The rear bumper was dented and there were a few scratches. I continued on my trip, returning the car at Los Angeles where Hertz said it would be in touch. Within 24 hours of flying out of Los Angeles, Hertz charged my credit card £252.38 with no warning or explanation. I then received a letter from Hertz saying that, as I was not at fault, it would claim against the person who hit me, but if unsuccessful it would charge me for damage. I have now received a letter saying that it was unable to pursue the claim with the other person, so are now charging me $941.31 [£610] to ‘reimburse the balance of the claim’ – this for a small dent is excessive. I have emailed the ‘Recovery Specialist’ at Hertz twice with no reply. My memories of a Californian road trip have been soured by the whole experience. MD, Cornwall.
A. Hertz has now investigated the incident more thoroughly. As a result, Hertz has located the insurance details for the other driver and is directly pursuing them for recovery of the costs of the damage. It has therefore dropped its claim for the $941.31. Hertz says that the £252.38 taken from your credit card was for additional charges that you agreed to and were unrelated to the accident.
Q. My wife and I invested a large sum in a fixed term deposit account with the Clydesdale Bank, commencing on 28 November 2008 and maturing on 28 November 2011. We received a “Statement of Credit Interest Paid and Income Tax Deduction” in a letter dated 8 June this year, but for the period 6 April 2009 to 5 April 2010. I wrote to Clydesdale asking for details of interest paid between 28 November 2008 and 6 April 2009. After nearly a month I had not received a response so wrote again. To my astonishment Clydesdale wrote in July stating it had commenced putting my ‘complaint’ through their Complaints Procedure. On 7 August 2010 a second letter arrived from Clydesdale saying that their investigation of my complaint was ongoing. But I am still waiting for a reply to my original letter of 16 June! CE, Dyfed.
A. Clydesdale treated your second letter requesting basic information on interest earned as a letter of complaint. This meant that the bank failed to address your actual request. Clydesdale accepts it did not handle your correspondence in an appropriate way, apologises and has agreed to pay you £50 as a goodwill gesture.
Q. I have contributed £250 each month to a HSBC Regular Savings Account, which matured on 23 July. When I checked on 24 July, a Saturday, I found the £3,000 which had been in the savings account was not shown on my online banking facility. I phoned HSBC, which advised that “due to my account maturing near a weekend, the money is taken off online banking and would reappear on the savings account with interest on Monday”. Are HSBC allowed to take the money for the whole weekend off my online account? PU, Smethwick.
A. HSBC insists it did nothing wrong. Funds in a savings account are withdrawn from online view two days prior to maturity, ensuring no transactions take place at the point of maturity –though funds could have been withdrawn through the bank’s call centre. Your funds were transferred between accounts on the same day – so you did not lose any interest. “The money had not disappeared or been missing from the customer’s account at anytime,” says an HSBC spokesman.
Q. I have two accounts with Dunbar Bank. In April Dunbar suggested that to obtain a higher rate of interest I should close one account and transfer the balance to the other account with an additional deposit of more than £3,000. I did as requested. Two months later I checked on the state of the account to find that the transaction had fallen through because of ‘insufficient funds’. Dunbar had forgotten to take into account a monthly direct debit. Why did they not simply phone me for another cheque? The charming manager explained that they had ‘internal difficulties’. LR, London.
A. Dunbar Bank puts forward a different explanation for the problem. It explains that you have two accounts with the bank: one is a term deposit paying 2.5 per cent and a second that is an easy access account paying 0.5 per cent below base rate – which means nothing at present. In order to improve the rate of interest paid on your funds, you were going to top-up the main account as you indicate. But Dunbar says that this was agreed on 20 April, yet you only paid the money into the account on 2 June. By that time other transactions had taken place, bringing the balance below the necessary £5,000 to take advantage of the higher interest rate on offer. To make matters worse, by the time you attempted to resolve the matter – on 14 July – Dunbar had ceased offering new higher rate deposit accounts. Dunbar reports that it had, prior to this, attempted to explain the situation to you, but had been unable to contact you. A spokeswoman for the bank says: “It seems to be a simple case of bad timing, but I can understand that makes it no less frustrating for [the reader] to have missed the term deposit rate. We’re sorry that we couldn’t act on her instruction and that we didn’t have the foresight to alert her to the impact of future payments out of the easy access account during that first conversation.”